‘COURTS ON TRIAL‘*
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Verdict on Drug Courts and Other Problem-Solving Courts
Scientists, in contrast, rarely speak of verdicts. To the scientist, virtually all conclusions are provisional and subject to revision as new data become available. Much of what is believed to be true turns out, after the collection of more information, to be only partially true, conditionally true, or sometimes outright false.1 It is, therefore, most prudent to withhold final judgment until al...
متن کاملBargaining on Multi-Member Courts
We present a simple sequential bargaining model of a collegial court, analogous to Baron and Ferejohn’s sequential bargaining model of a legislature. However, the model incorporates critical features of appellate court jurisprudence — including disposition votes and coalitions, opinion assignment, opinion writing, and voting over draft opinions to create a majority opinion —so that it is indeed...
متن کاملDisagreements on Collegial Courts : A
How do disagreements between judges on collegial (multimember) courts affect legal policy? We address this question by developing an account of the nature of judicial disagreements in the case-space model of judicial choice. We distinguish between different types of disagreement, from disagreements about case facts to disagreements about how legal rules should treat varying case facts, and cons...
متن کاملCourts and torts: the psychiatrist preparing for trial.
OBJECTIVE To outline how a psychiatric expert can do an impartial assessment and medicolegal report and then give an effective presentation in court that can sustain cross-examination. METHODS The legal principles of litigating emotional trauma are reviewed, including proving causation, characterizing emotional suffering, assessing disability, and determining a realistic prognosis. RESULTS ...
متن کاملLegal Doctrine on Collegial Courts
Appellate courts, which have the most control over legal doctrine, tend to operate through collegial (multimember) decision making. How does this collegiality affect their choice of legal doctrine? Can decisions by appellate courts be expected to result in a meaningful collegial rule? How do such collegial rules differ from the rules of individual judges? We explore these questions and show tha...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Modern Law Review
سال: 1950
ISSN: 0026-7961
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.1950.tb00179.x